ArticleMalaria journal2025
Field evaluation of the miniature direct-on-blood PCR nucleic acid lateral flow immunoassay (mini-dbPCR-NALFIA) for the detection of Plasmodium falciparum in high seasonal malaria transmission setting in Burkina Faso.
Article in Malaria journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Current practices and innovative diagnostics for Malaria in Ethiopia: a scoping review.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAccurate diagnosis of malaria, caused by Plasmodium falciparum, remains challenging in endemic resource-limited settings. Molecular diagnostics, like PCR, offer a higher sensitivity, but are often impractical at the point-of-care. A relatively simple molecular diagnostic test has been developed to overcome the technological challenges frequently encountered during the implementation of molecular tools. We present here the results of the field evaluation of this novel mini direct-on-blood PCR platform with lateral flow readout (dbPCR-NALFIA), in a rural setting of Burkina Faso.
methodsA phase 3 diagnostic accuracy study was conducted over one year in a high P. falciparum transmission setting in Burkina Faso. Febrile patients of all ages (n = 438) were screened using PfHRP2-based RDT, microscopy, and the investigational dbPCR-NALFIA test. Reference diagnostic test was qPCR targeting the P. falciparum varATS gene. Diagnostic accuracy metrics (sensitivity, specificity, predictive values) and agreement (Cohen's kappa) were calculated for each method.
resultsMalaria prevalence by qPCR was 65.5% (287/438). A total of 99.2% (259/261) of P. falciparum microscopy-positive samples were detected by qPCR, 97.7% (253/259) detected with RDT and 99.6% (258/259) with the investigational dbPCR-NALFIA. Overall, 85.2% (149/177) of microscopy negative samples were also confirmed negative with qPCR. Among these qPCR negative samples, 80.5% (120/149) were concordantly negative by RDT, while 98.0% (146/149) were confirmed negative by dbPCR-NALFIA. Using qPCR as reference, the dbPCR-NALFIA demonstrated a sensitivity of 96.5% and specificity of 98.0%, comparable to RDT sensitivity (95.1%) and microscopy specificity (98.7%), but out-performed RDT specificity (80.8%) and microscopy sensitivity (90.2%). dbPCR-NALFIA detected 67.9% of sub microscopic qPCR-positive samples missed by the microscopy. Agreement with qPCR was the highest for dbPCR-NALFIA (kappa value = 0.90), compared to microscopy (kappa value = 0.80) and RDT (kappa value = 0.71).
conclusionThe dbPCR-NALFIA shows excellent diagnostic performance to detect P. falciparum under field conditions. It addresses key limitations of other diagnostics and could play a vital role in case detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.