ArticleBMC surgery2025
Comparative analysis of the therapeutic effects of cosmetic tension-reducing suturing technique and traditional suturing technique in 120 patients with maxillofacial trauma.
Article in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of aesthetic suturing on wound healing and scar formation in patients with traffic accident-related injuries.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the beneficial effects of cosmetic tension-reducing suturing techniques in repairing maxillofacial trauma.
methodsA retrospective study was conducted on 120 patients with maxillofacial trauma, who presented to outpatient departments and emergencies from March to September 2024. Patients were divided into two groups equally. The experimental group (n = 60) was subjected to cosmetic tension-reducing suturing. The control group (n = 60) was subjected to traditional suturing. Evaluations targeted clinical outcomes, adverse event rates, patient satisfaction, and scar width and characteristics using the Scar Score- Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS).
resultsLonger procedure times were noted in the experimental group, but there was less than 5% adverse event rate compared to 27% of the control group. By the fourth postoperative day, three patients in the experimental group exhibited localized inflammation and infection, which were resolved with secondary cleaning and closure, while all other wounds healed primarily. The experimental group showed a significant improvement of P < 0.05 in aesthetic-functional scores and the scar thickness reduced significantly.
conclusionThe application of cosmetic tension-reducing suturing techniques in maxillofacial trauma helps reduce complications and scar formation during the healing period, improves aesthetic outcomes and increases patient satisfaction. Therefore, it enhances the clinical applicability of these techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.