ArticleBMC research notes2025
Evaluation of the hospital service quality using the Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) tool in Ardabil city.
Article in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Perceptual Gap Analysis of Service Quality Perceptions in Home-Based Long-Term Care Service Centers.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveQuality can serve as a strategic differentiator that provides a competitive advantage. The Importance–Performance Analysis (IPA) model is an effective tool for identifying quality gaps from the perspective of users. This study aims to evaluate the quality of hospital services from the viewpoint of inpatients in teaching hospitals in Ardabil city using the IPA model.
resultsThe overall mean score of service performance from the patients’ perspective was 68.43 ± 2.82, while the importance score was 98.34 ± 2.58. The highest performance was observed in the service process (11.76 ± 1.09), tangibles (10.30 ± 1.41), and empathy (9.49 ± 0.93). The most significant dimensions were also the service process (16.44 ± 0.98) and tangibles (15.30 ± 1.41). A significant correlation was found between importance and performance scores (r = 0.89, p < 0.001). Demographic and clinical variables did not have a significant effect on patients’ perceptions (p > 0.05).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.