ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2025
Barriers and facilitators to advance care planning for people with intellectual disabilities: a cross-sectional survey study of professional caregiver perspectives.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdvance care planning (ACP) is a critical process for ensuring person-centred end-of-life care, yet it remains underutilized among people with intellectual disabilities (ID). Understanding caregivers' perspectives is essential to identify barriers and facilitators to ACP implementation and improve practice. This study aimed to examine how professional caregivers in Austria perceive and experience ACP for people with ID, including its current use, barriers, facilitators, and strategies to improve uptake.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted using a structured online form comprising multiple-choice and open-ended questions. Data were collected from 125 professional caregivers across Austria who were primary caregivers of at least one adult with ID and proficient in German. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, while qualitative responses to open-ended questions were subjected to content analysis.
resultsA total of 33.6% of caregivers reported engaging in ACP discussions, with considerable barriers including cognitive and communicative challenges, emotional discomfort, and structural constraints. Facilitators included person-centred communication, interdisciplinary collaboration, and targeted training. Notably, 83.2% of caregivers expressed interest in ACP training.
conclusionsACP is rarely practiced in the care of people with ID in Austria. However, caregivers identified clear pathways to improve implementation, particularly through training, use of tailored communication methods, and systemic support within care institutions. Promoting inclusive ACP practices is essential to uphold the autonomy and health equity of people with ID, ensuring their voices are heard in decisions about their future and end-of-life care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.