Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41455952›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2025

Evaluation of the quality, accuracy, and reliability of YouTube™ videos on laminate veneer treatment in Turkish.

Baturalp Arslan, Ezgi Arslan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Baturalp ArslanDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Bilecik Şeyh Edebali University, Bilecik, Turkey. baturalparslan94@gmail.com.ORCID 0009-0001-9489-6906
Ezgi Arslan, Kütahya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-2372-3047

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimYouTube™, a social media platform with a wide range of video content, is widely used in the information acquisition process. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of information on YouTube™ regarding laminate veneer treatment in dentistry. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this cross-sectional study, videos on the social media platform YouTube™ ( https://www.youtube.com ) were evaluated. The term used for the search was ''laminate veneer''. Specialised tools and scoring criteria are required to objectively assess the quality, accuracy and reliability of videos. DISCERN, the Modified Global Quality Index (mGQS) scale, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) and the HONcode guidelines are frequently used to assess the quality of videos. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS 20.0 software (IBM SPSS Statistics, v20; IBM Corp) at a 95% confidence level. The normality of the DISCERN, JAMA and mGQS measurements was examined using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to examine whether the measurements showed significant differences according to source and content groups. The relationships between variables were examined using correlation analysis.

resultsA total of 109 YouTube™ videos on laminate veneer treatment in dentistry were evaluated for their content, quality, accuracy and reliability. The average length of the videos was 2.59 min. The average number of likes was 44.0 and the average number of comments on the videos was 6.8. It was determined that the content of laminate veneer treatment is focused on informative videos. For DISCERN, the mean of the informative content group was higher than the other groups. For JAMA, the mean of the informative group was higher than the advertisement and case presentation group, the mean of the educational group was higher than the advertisement group and for mGQS, the mean of the informative and educational group was higher than the advertisement and case presentation group (p < 0.05). The DISCERN measure revealed a positive correlation with JAMA at a level of 79.4%, the mGQS measure showed a positive correlation with DISCERN at a level of 89.4% and with JAMA, at a level of 83.3%.

conclusionIn this study in which YouTubeTM videos about laminate veneer treatment were analysed, it was discovered that the accuracy and reliability level of the videos are moderate. Patients wishing to acquire information regarding the treatment are indeed able to do so reliably by watching these videos. Moreover, the number of quality videos for educational purposes should be increased for dental students.

Indexed as

Dental VeneersSocial MediaVideo RecordingCross-Sectional StudiesHumansReproducibility of ResultsTurkeyDental veneersDiş estetikGülüş tasarımıInternetPorselen veneerSocial media

Identifiers

PMID41455952
PMCPMC12829151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.