Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41455950›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Examining the impact of alerting visual stimuli on the effectiveness of practising surgical scrub technique in medical education.

Erzsebet Vanyolos, Eszter Lidak, Mihalyne Boros, Karolina Kosa, Gabriella Gomori, Nikolett Orosz, Katalin Peto, Norbert Nemeth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Erzsebet VanyolosDepartment of Operative Techniques and Surgical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Moricz Zsigmond krt. 98, Debrecen, H-4032, Hungary. vanyolos@med.unideb.hu.
Eszter LidakDepartment of Operative Techniques and Surgical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Moricz Zsigmond krt. 98, Debrecen, H-4032, Hungary.
Mihalyne BorosDepartment of Operative Techniques and Surgical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Moricz Zsigmond krt. 98, Debrecen, H-4032, Hungary.
Karolina KosaDepartment of Behavioural Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Gabriella GomoriDepartment of Hospital Hygiene, University of Debrecen Clinical Centre, Debrecen, Hungary.
Nikolett OroszDepartment of Hospital Hygiene, University of Debrecen Clinical Centre, Debrecen, Hungary.
Katalin PetoDepartment of Operative Techniques and Surgical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Moricz Zsigmond krt. 98, Debrecen, H-4032, Hungary.
Norbert NemethDepartment of Operative Techniques and Surgical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Moricz Zsigmond krt. 98, Debrecen, H-4032, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInadequate surgical scrubbing is a key risk factor for surgical site infections (SSIs). Visual documentation of errors during training enhances learning while the Semmelweis Scanner provides objective quality control. This study hypothesized that displaying graphic images of severe SSIs in the scrub room would improve students’ surgical scrub discipline and effectiveness. By serving as a stark visual reminder of the consequences of poor hand hygiene, this approach was expected to enhance adherence to proper scrubbing protocols, especially among Generation Z students, who respond well to multisensory learning strategies.

methodsThe study involved 121 medical students in the “Basic surgical techniques” course during the 2nd semester of 2023/2024. The last phase of the surgical scrub was performed with hand disinfectant containing fluorescein. Participant identification utilized Radio Frequency Identification (RFID). Measurements were taken 4 times with Semmelweis Scanner device (HandInScan Zrt.), examining error localization and proportion relative to the total hand area. Students were divided into two groups: Group A (n = 58) performed scrubs without visual stimuli, while Group B (n = 63) was exposed to SSI images during two of four sessions. Performance was categorized as low, medium, or high based on error rates. Group B completed a questionnaire evaluating the images’ impact and their motivation for proper hand hygiene.

resultsBetween measurements 2 and 3, Group B (with visual stimuli) showed a significant increase in high performers (24 to 42) and a reduced error rate (11.98 ± 5.12% to 4.77 ± 3.06%). Of Group B’s 63 students, 60.3% found the SSI images motivating, 34.9% were neutral, and 4.8% found them disturbing or distracting. All Group B students acknowledged hand hygiene’s critical role in infection prevention. Additionally, 44.4% recommended more frequent Semmelweis Scanner use, and 36.5% suggested additional visual tools to enhance scrubbing efficiency.

conclusionsGraphic SSI images as visual stimuli significantly improved surgical scrub techniques by boosting motivation and accelerating the learning curve. This method supports the prevention of healthcare-associated infections and enhances patient safety. Due to its effectiveness, the approach was integrated into the “Basic surgical techniques” course starting the following semester, with potential for broader application in medical education.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalHand DisinfectionPhotic StimulationSurgical Wound InfectionFemaleHumansMaleStudents, MedicalFluorescein UV lightGeneration z learningHealthcare-associated infectionsInfection preventionMedical educationPatient safetySemmelweis scannerSurgical hand hygieneSurgical scrub techniqueVisual stimuli

Identifiers

PMID41455950
PMCPMC12914892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.