ArticleBMC public health2025
Football cooperative: a pragmatic controlled trial of a community-based physical activity social intervention for men when replicated using a Social Return on Investment (SROI) framework protocol paper.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcross the western world, men tend to have lower life expectancy compared to women and have higher mortality rates for most of the leading causes of deaths at all ages. While biological factors such as genetics and hormones may seem to contribute to men’s heightened vulnerability to certain diseases and health conditions, these elements alone do not fully explain the significant disparities observed in health outcomes between men and women. To address this challenge, the Football Cooperative (FC) initiative provides social recreational football games for men aimed at reducing social isolation and improving their overall health and wellbeing. Since 2021, the FC initiative has been the subject of a feasibility study for scale up and an implementation science study to develop an implementation strategy to replicate across multiple sites.
methodsAdopting a pragmatically controlled design within a social return on investment (SROI) framework, this study proposes to assess the efficacy of the FC initiative when replicated from two to twelve sites to (a) determine the SROI of FC games when replicated (b) the biopsychosocial health impacts the FC games (c) the game play demands of the FC games and (d) the reach of FC games at scale. To comprehensively address the aims, a mixed methods approach will be employed whereby each step of the seven steps of the SROI framework will be treated as separate studies; steps 1, 2 and 3 will adopt a qualitative approach (interviews and focus group discussions) to develop Theories of Change (TOC) for each stakeholder group, while steps 4, 5 and 6 will adopt quantitative approaches (objective assessments and surveys over time). Step 7 will detail the processes involved in the calculation of the final SROI figure.
conclusionsThe findings from this study will inform fidelity of delivery and equitable benefit for participants when the FC initiative is scaled up nationally and internationally. The use of SROI strengthens the case for investment while providing insights into how Evidence Based Practices (EBPs) can be adapted and scaled in other settings.
trial registrationThis study has been registered with the ‘International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number’ registry [ISRCTN14888262] as of the 2nd of July 2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.