ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
Contrastive learning for cell division detection and tracking in live cell imaging data.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bayesian Transformers and Higher-Order Graph Matching for Cell Tracking in Serial Tissue Sections.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2026Article
- CELLECT: contrastive embedding learning for large-scale efficient cell tracking.Nature methods · 2025Article
- Representation learning enables robust single cell phenotyping in whole slide liquid biopsy imaging.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Contrastive Representation Learning for Single Cell Phenotyping in Whole Slide Imaging of Enrichment-free Liquid Biopsy.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFluorescent live-cell microscopy enables the study of cellular dynamics by imaging specific molecules, their interactions, and biochemical states in living samples. It is vital for biological research and drug screening. However, live-cell imaging must balance temporal resolution with cell viability due to photo-toxicity, often necessitating lower temporal resolution to extend observation periods. This reduction complicates the tracking of cells and detection of cell division events, limiting the study of dynamic cellular processes.
resultsWe present an integrated methodology combining contrastive learning and graph-based techniques to improve cell division detection and tracking in video microscopy with low temporal resolution. Our approach uses contrastive learning models to generate robust cell representations that enhance both division detection and tracking accuracy. Specifically, we develop a weakly-supervised contrastive learning strategy leveraging time-based augmentations to build temporal cell representations. In addition, we propose a novel graph optimization method to identify cell tracks using these representations alongside observed division events. Evaluation on an in-house dataset and public benchmarks demonstrates significant performance gains across both native and reduced temporal resolutions.
conclusionsThe proposed methodology improves adaptability to various temporal resolutions, enabling more precise and efficient analysis of live-cell microscopy data. This advancement supports extended observation periods necessary for drug screening and biological studies by preserving cell viability and normal homeostasis. Our approach facilitates deeper insights into cellular mechanisms and has the potential to enhance therapeutic research workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.