ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2025
Development and validation of a long-term mortality prediction model in acute coronary syndrome survivors: a study of a predominantly male, lower-risk cohort with the capacity to complete cardiopulmonary exercise testing.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a major global health burden with a high risk of adverse outcomes. Existing predictive models (e.g., GRACE) primarily rely on static indicators and focus on short-term prognosis, limiting their ability to comprehensively assess patient status and predict long-term mortality. To address the need for improved long-term risk prediction in this specific patient subgroup, this study developed and validated a long-term mortality prediction model for ACS patients incorporating cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and other clinical indicators.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included ACS patients treated at Tongji Hospital from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2018. Demographic data, medical histories, CPET indicators, laboratory indicators, and other baseline data were collected, and all-cause mortality was followed up until June 30, 2023. All data sets were randomly divided into derivation and validation cohorts in a ratio of 7/3. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and Cox multivariate analysis were used to identify independent risk factors and a risk prediction model was established using nomograms.
resultsA total of 299 patients were included in this cohort (211 in the derivation cohort and 88 in the validation cohort), with an average age of 57.00 years, including 280 males (93.6%). The median follow-up time was 3821 days, and 46 cases (15.4%) reached the study endpoint. The derivation cohort identified four independent predictive factors: age, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), ejection fraction (EF), and heart rate reserve (HRR), and a Nomogram scoring model was constructed based on these factors. The model demonstrated good discrimination in the derivation cohort (C-index: 0.83) but this decreased in the validation cohort (C-index: 0.72), suggesting potential overfitting. Time-dependent calibration analysis showed poor agreement at 5 years in the validation cohort (R
conclusionsA model based on four readily available variables-age, BUN, EF, and the key CPET parameter, HRR-may have utility for predicting long-term all-cause mortality. This model provides a preliminary tool for the long-term management of a specific subpopulation of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) survivors, namely a predominantly male, lower-risk cohort with the capacity to complete CPET. Further external validation in similar populations is required before prospective clinical application.
trial registrationRegistry: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry; TRN: ChiCTR2100052199; Registration date: October 22, 2021.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.