ReviewBone marrow transplantation2026
CAR T-cells in multiple myeloma: the race to the start line.
Review in Bone marrow transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The treatment landscape for multiple myeloma is rapidly evolving, driven by T-cell-mediated tumor responses through CAR T-cell therapies and bispecific antibodies. Since KarMMa and CARTITUDE-1 established the activity of idecabtagene vicleucel and ciltacabtagene autoleucel in heavily pretreated disease, efforts have intensified to move them earlier, culminating in KarMMa-3 and CARTITUDE-4, which demonstrated superiority to standard regimens in earlier lines and prompted label expansions. Yet randomized data alone do not capture real-world effectiveness. Emerging cohorts highlight attrition before infusion, product-specific safety signatures with infection-driven non-relapse mortality, and heterogeneous outcomes in high-risk biology such as extramedullary disease, adverse cytogenetics, and early relapse. Access and delivery constraints, including bridging intensity, vein-to-vein intervals, out-of-specification release, and outpatient feasibility, further determine who benefits. This review synthesizes updated randomized and real-world evidence for idecabtagene vicleucel and ciltacabtagene autoleucel, examines challenging populations and emerging toxicities, and delineates operational factors that shape outcomes at scale. We outline where CAR T should displace existing standards, where caution is warranted, and which innovations in targets, constructs, and manufacturing are most likely to advance the start line.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41455805What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.