ArticleScientific reports2025
Securing IoT networks: a machine learning approach for detecting unusual traffic patterns.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Comprehensive Survey on Online AutoML and Adversarial Robustness for IoT and EV Charging Network Security.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The exponential growth of the Internet of Things (IoT) poses substantial security challenges due to its heterogeneous, decentralized nature. This paper introduces a machine learning (ML) framework to enhance IoT network security by identifying and mitigating anomalous traffic patterns. The combination of the NBaIoT and UNSW-NB15 datasets enabled us to construct a complete environment for analysis. We used an extensive data preprocessing pipeline, including cleaning, integration, transformation, and feature engineering, to prepare the datasets for ML. We constructed a framework that was assessed with several types of ML models and achieved good results: the decision tree model with support of 95% accuracy and 93% precision with 92% recall and F1 score of 92.5; the SVM model with the backing of 96% accuracy and 94% precision with 92 and 95 recall and F1 score respectively; the random forest model with support of 97% accuracy and 96% precision with 92 and 95 recall and F1 score respectively. The best performance of our neural network model was 98% precision, 97% recall, and 97.5% perception, respectively. These findings indicate that our neural network-based framework is more effective at detecting and preventing IoT traffic anomalies than other models, in both accuracy and overall efficiency. The results highlight the potential of using ML to deliver robust, scalable, real-time anomaly-detection solutions for an IoT network. Further studies will aim to improve it by implementing the model in practice and incorporating additional datasets and machine-learning methods to make the model more flexible and resilient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.