ArticleScientific reports2025
Red-billed blue magpie optimization for training feedforward neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-Strategy Improved Red-Billed Blue Magpie Optimization Algorithm and Its Engineering Applications.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The input layer, hidden layer, and output layer constitute the feedforward neural networks (FNNs) with unidirectional propagation and no feedback loop connection. The FNNs exhibit pivotal properties of nonlinear fitting ability, flexible structure, multitasking adaptability, easy implementation, strong compatibility and composability. The FNNs can independently tackle classification and regression tasks and support the construction of complex networks. The red-billed blue magpie optimization (RBMO) is constructed on the collective collaborative exploration and sophisticated hunting proficiency of the red-billed blue magpies. The RBMO emulates searching for food sources, chasing and attacking prey, and hoarding superfluous food to balance extensive global exploration and meticulous local exploitation, and to ascertain the fittest solution. In this paper, the RBMO is proposed to train FNNs, the motivation is to measure the dissimilarity between anticipated and actual outputs, quantify the training efficiency and classification precision of the sample datasets, and fabricate the connection weights and biases. The RBMO exhibits the distinctive advantages of extensible adaptability and flexibility, accelerated convergence speed, heightened calculation accuracy, decreased control parameters, remarkable robustness and stability, and diminished computational complexity. Seventeen sample datasets are utilized to authenticate the applicability and practicality, the RBMO is compared with SFOA, FLO, APO, HEOA, EGO, BKA, WO, HO, IAO, NRBO, ETO and PO. The experimental results demonstrate that the RBMO can dynamically alternate between exploration and exploitation to strengthen stability and robustness, intensify training efficiency and classification precision, promote convergence speed and solution quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.