ArticleScientific reports2025
Integrating feature selection and explainable CNN for identification and classification of pests and beneficial insects.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep learning-based battery health prediction for enhancing electric vehicle performance.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable identification of agricultural pests and beneficial insects is crucial for sustainable crop protection and ecological balance, yet most vision-based models remain black boxes and require high-dimensional features. This paper proposes an explainable hybrid insect-classification framework that combines convolutional neural network (CNN) feature extraction with a dual-XAI feature selection strategy. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Permutation Feature Importance (PFI) are applied in parallel to rank handcrafted and CNN-derived features, and their intersection yields a compact, biologically meaningful subset for final classification. The selected features are evaluated using lightweight classifiers and a hybrid ensemble, enabling accurate inference under field variability. Experiments on a curated, balanced dataset of four classes (Colorado potato beetle, green peach aphid, seven-spot ladybird, and healthy leaves) collected under diverse lighting and background conditions achieve 96.7% overall accuracy, with precision, recall, and F1-scores all above 96%. Importantly, performance remains stable when reducing dimensionality, retaining ≥90% accuracy using only the top 11 hybrid-selected features. These results demonstrate that integrating SHAP and PFI improves both robustness and interpretability, supporting practical deployment for automated pest monitoring and precision agriculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.