ArticleScientific reports2025
Hydraulic support pressure prediction via deep learning with multilevel temporal feature integration.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Asynchronous Monitoring-Induced Deviation in Hydraulic Support Peak Estimation and Its Sensitivity to Synchronization and Sampling Resolution: A Case Study of a Solid Backfilling Working Face.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based intelligent prediction of strata pressure in a steeply inclined fully mechanized longwall face.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Physics-Informed Monotonic Conformer for Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Hydraulic Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate prediction of hydraulic support pressure is crucial for ensuring coal mine safety. With increasing mining depths and increasingly complex operating environments, precise prediction faces greater challenges. To address these challenges, this study proposes an LSTM-PatchTST prediction method based on multi-dimensional feature dependency fusion: First, Pearson correlation analysis is used to screen key features, and Gaussian moving average filtering optimizes the data; Subsequently, the preprocessed time series is input to the LSTM network, where the forget gate and input gate capture short-term fluctuations and long-term trends respectively, while residual connections ensure complete preservation of multi-layer temporal features; Then, the dynamic features extracted by LSTM are passed to the PatchTST module, which divides the sequence into local patches, with a multi-layer self-attention encoder simultaneously modeling local details and global dependencies, achieving deep feature fusion. The model's performance is validated using actual pressure data from Fucun Coal Mine in Zaozhuang, Shandong. Experimental results show that, compared to pure PatchTST and Transformer + LSTM models, the proposed model reduces RMSE by approximately 48.6% and 30.0%, and MAE by approximately 58.7% and 38.8%, respectively. Finally, to further verify the model's generalization ability, the trained model was transferred to a dataset from Gengcun Coal Mine in Yima, Henan, where compared to pure PatchTST and Transformer + LSTM models, the proposed model reduces RMSE by approximately 34.6% and 31.4%, and MAE by approximately 35.7% and 29.9%, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.