ArticleScientific reports2025
Development of machine learning models to identify potentially active compounds against tuberculosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes following robot-assisted renal surgery: KangDuo versus Da Vinci systems.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Degree-based Inverse Prodeg indices linking graph theory and cheminformatics with sharp results and QSPR modeling.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) is a contagious bacterial disease affecting millions of people globally and is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality, particularly in the developing world. The spread of multi-drug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis has emerged as a major challenge to TB treatment, demanding the discovery of novel drug candidates. The process requires fast and efficient lead identification methodologies. This research content embarks on a comprehensive exploration of machine learning algorithms applied to identify potential compounds active against TB. Leveraging a comprehensive dataset encompassing 23,791 molecules from 5 targets with unique SMILES and ChEMBL IDs obtained from the ChEMBL database, a total of 103 classification models were developed based on six different types of molecular representations, namely RDKit descriptors (RDKitDes), MACCS fingerprints (MACCSFP), Morgan fingerprints (MorganFP), Atom-pair fingerprints (PairsFP), PubChem fingerprints (PubChemFP), and RDKit fingerprints (RDKitFP). In this regard, seven machine learning algorithms, e.g., Random Forest (RF), XGBoost, Decision Tree (DT), k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB), Logistic Regression (LR), and ANN, were employed to build these models using different combinations of dataset. Further, the performance of the models was assessed using a tenfold cross-validation, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) as the evaluation metric. In addition to that, the contribution of the important descriptors in the molecule's bioactivities was interpreted using the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.