Trial reportBlood cancer journal2025
Efficacy and safety of isatuximab subcutaneous plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: results of the Phase 2 study IZALCO.
Trial report in Blood cancer journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05704049 (A Randomized, Phase 2, Open Label Study Evaluating Subcutaneous Administration of Isatuximab in Combination With Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone in Adult Participants With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Phase 2, Open Label Study Evaluating Subcutaneous Administration of Isatuximab in Combination With Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone in Adult Participants With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the Phase 2 IZALCO study, we evaluated efficacy, patient preference, safety and pharmacokinetics for isatuximab administered SC by an innovative on-body injector (OBI) or manual injection, plus carfilzomib-dexamethasone (Kd) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients. In Part 1, isatuximab SC was injected manually (cycles 1-6). In Part 2, patients were randomized to isatuximab SC by manual injection (cycles 1-3) followed by OBI administration (cycles 4-6) or to isatuximab OBI (cycles 1-3) followed by manual injection (cycles 4-6). From cycle 7, all patients could choose either treatment method. Overall, 74 RRMM patients received isatuximab SC plus Kd: 8 in Part 1 and 66 in Part 2. The patients had a median age of 65.0 years (44-85) with a median of 1 prior treatment line (1-5). The study met its primary efficacy endpoint with a 79.7% overall response rate (N = 74), at a median follow-up of 10.1 months. 74.5% of patients preferred the OBI rather than manual injection, 17% preferred manual injection, 8.5% had no preference. No impact of the SC delivery method was observed on efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity of isatuximab given SC plus Kd, supporting the feasibility of using the OBI as a convenient method for isatuximab SC administration. Clinical trial information: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05704049.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.