ArticleScientific reports2025
Comprehensive framework of machine learning and deep learning architectures with metaheuristic optimization for high-fidelity prediction of nanofluid specific heat capacity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurately predicting the specific heat capacity of nanofluids is critical for optimizing their performance in engineering and industrial applications. This study explores twelve machine learning and deep learning models using conventional and stacking ensemble techniques. In the stacking framework, a linear regression model is employed as a meta-learner to improve base model performance. Additionally, two nature-inspired metaheuristic optimization algorithms-Particle Swarm Optimization and Grey Wolf Optimization-were used to fine-tune the hyperparameters of machine learning models. This research is based on a comprehensive dataset of 1,269 experimental nanofluid samples, with key inputs including nanofluid type (hybrid and direct), temperature, and volume concentration. To improve model generalization, data augmentation strategies inspired by polynomial/Fourier expansions and autoencoder-based methods were implemented. The results demonstrate that the stacked multi-layer perceptron model, integrated with linear regression, achieved the highest predictive accuracy, recording an R² score of 0.99927, a mean squared error of 466.06, and a root mean squared error of 21.58. Among standalone machine learning models, CatBoost was the best performer (R² score: 0.99923, MSE: 487.71, RMSE: 22.08), ranking second overall. The impact of metaheuristic optimization was significant; Grey Wolf Optimization, for instance, reduced the LightGBM model's mean squared error from 29386.43 to 6549.006. These findings underscore the efficacy of hybrid ML/DL frameworks, advanced data augmentation, and metaheuristic optimization in predictive modeling of nanofluid thermophysical properties, providing a robust foundation for future research in heat transfer applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.