ArticleJournal of the neurological sciences2026
Effects of surgical therapies on cognitive function in patients with essential tremor.
Article in Journal of the neurological sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEssential tremor (ET) is associated with increased risk of cognitive decline, particularly with advancing age. Surgical therapies, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) and MR-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS), are effective treatment options for tremor, but their long-term cognitive effects remain unclear. This is the first study to compare ET patients who underwent surgery to those who had not.
objectiveWe assessed cognitive outcomes in ET patients who underwent surgical therapies and compared them to non-surgical controls.
methodsWe identified both surgical (n = 12) and non-surgical ET cases (n = 188) from a large prospective longitudinal study and compared their cognitive function. Cognitive function was assessed prior to and following surgery, over the course of 36- and 54-month intervals. Mixed model analyses of covariance were used to assess cognitive changes over time, controlling for age, global cognitive scores, years of education, and study visit.
resultsAlthough both groups showed modest cognitive decline over time, few significant differences were observed between the surgical and non-surgical groups. Significant group × time interactions were observed for several tests, with the surgical group demonstrating greater decline in some subdomains of Memory and Executive Function.
conclusionSurgical therapies such as DBS and MRgFUS do not appear to broadly impact global cognitive function in older ET patients. However, specific cognitive domains may be more susceptible to decline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.