Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41455019›Full record

ArticleNeuroinformatics2025

Synthetic Data Generation for Classifying Electrophysiological and Morpho-Electrophysiological Neurons from Mouse Visual Cortex.

Xavier Vasques, Laura Cif

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xavier VasquesInstitut du Neurone, Montferriez sur lez, France. xaviervasques@institutduneurone.fr.
Laura CifInstitut du Neurone, Montferriez sur lez, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate classification of neuronal cell types is essential for understanding brain organization, but multimodal neuron datasets are scarce and strongly imbalanced across subclasses. We present a benchmark of synthetic data augmentation methods for predicting electrophysiology-defined neuronal classes (e-types) in the Allen Cell Types mouse visual cortex dataset. Two supervised tasks were evaluated over the same 17 e-type labels: prediction from electrophysiology features alone (E→e-type) and prediction from combined morphology plus electrophysiology features (M + E→e-type). We established real-data baselines across multiple classifier families under a unified preprocessing pipeline, then augmented only the training sets using matched per-class grids with Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) and deep generative models: Variational Autoencoders (VAE), Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN), masked autoregressive normalizing flows, and Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models (DDPM). Augmentation produced substantial generalization gains when applied in the native high-dimensional feature space, whereas introducing dimensionality reduction largely suppressed these benefits. SMOTE delivered the most robust and consistent improvements across tasks and augmentation levels. To assess biological realism, we introduced a fidelity framework combining feature-wise distribution comparisons, statistical concordance tests, and distance-based measures that compare synthetic-to-real variability against the natural variability between real classes. Most synthetic datasets stayed within biological diversity bounds, with deviations concentrated in the rarest subclasses. These results provide practical guidance on selecting and validating synthetic augmentation for neuronal subtype classification.

Indexed as

Electrophysiological PhenomenaNeuronsVisual CortexAnimalsMiceComputational neuroscienceData augmentationGenerative modelsMachine learningMorpho-electrophysiology featuresNeuron cell typesNeurons classificationSynthetic data

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.