ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2025
Beyond screening: neighborhood-level factors associated with colorectal cancer stage at diagnosis.
Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWhile increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake is a major public health goal, it remains unclear whether screening rates consistently translate to high earlier-stage diagnosis at the community level. This study examined the relationship between screening and early stage CRC diagnosis, identifying barriers that may disrupt this pathway.
methodsWe used census-tract-level data on CRC patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2019 in the Ohio Cancer Incidence Surveillance System, linked to community-level screening estimates from CDC PLACES (2018). Census tracts were grouped into sociodemographically similar communities using the Max-p regionalization method. We applied geographic weighted regression (GWR) to assess spatial variation in the screening-early diagnosis relationship and used the Variable Selection Using Random Forest (VSURF) algorithm to identify key predictors of early stage diagnosis. Linear regression models evaluated associations between predictors, screening, and early stage diagnosis.
results2,952 census tracts were aggregated into 869 communities for analysis. Higher screening rates were not consistently associated with early stage diagnosis, as revealed by GWR, which showed significant regional variation. VSURF identified structural factors, rather than screening uptake, as top predictors of early stage diagnosis. In multivariable models, uninsurance (β - 0.29) and public transportation dependence (β - 0.31) were associated with lower early stage diagnosis, while the screening rate was not independently associated.
conclusionsStructural barriers may disrupt the screening-to-diagnosis pathway at the community level. Our findings underscore the importance of investing in follow-up infrastructure, including navigation and transportation, to ensure that screening achieves its goal of early detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41455016What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.