ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Effectiveness of a stepped-care model to address fear of cancer recurrence in patients with early-stage melanoma: results at 6- and 12-month follow-up.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the effectiveness of the Melanoma Care Program, an evidence-based, psychological intervention delivered through a stepped-care model, to address fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) in patients with early-stage melanoma at 6- and 12-month follow-up, when implemented into routine practice.
methodsIndividuals with stage 0-II melanoma participated in FCR severity screening using the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory. Participants with an FCR severity score of ≤ 12 were offered usual care. Participants with an FCR severity score of ≥ 13 were offered a psychoeducational booklet and a stepped-care model offering participants up to 5 psychotherapeutic telehealth sessions with a clinical psychologist. Multivariable linear mixed modelling was used to analyse outcomes at 1 week, 6 months, and 12 months post-intervention, including FCR severity (primary outcome), symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress, melanoma-related knowledge, and health-related quality of life.
resultsOne hundred and forty-three participants (111 women, mean age of 54.6 years) were screened; 115 (80%) participants had an FCR severity score ≥ 13, and of these, 112 (97%) participated in the intervention. Seventy-four participants (66%) completed 12-month follow-up. Adjusted multivariable linear mixed modelling demonstrated that the significant reduction in FCR severity found at 1 week post-intervention (mean change from baseline: -3.79; 95% CI: -4.72, -2.85; p < 0.001) was maintained at 6 months (mean change from baseline: -4.28; 95% CI: -5.30, -3.27; p < 0.001) and 12 months (mean change from baseline: -4.59; 95% CI: -5.62, -3.57; p < 0.001).
conclusionsThe Melanoma Care Program maintained effectiveness at 6- and 12-month follow-up when implemented into routine clinical practice for people with early-stage melanoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41455003What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.