ArticleExperimental brain research2025
The effect of instructions regarding gaze direction on stability of movements and accuracy of trajectory control during cycling.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In real-world locomotion, manipulation of visual information influence movement. It has been suggested that both near and distant visual information are used to control locomotion. However, it has not yet been clarified whether the two archetypal conditions of visual behavior differently affect dynamic balance during cycling. Therefore, our study aimed to investigate the effect of instructions regarding gaze direction on stability of cycling movements and accuracy of cycling trajectory. Twenty participants rode as straight as possible along a 20-m straight line at a low speed (2.4 ± 1.4 m/s), performing five trials for each condition. Participants were instructed to gaze at a far target at eye level (distant-upper condition), at a far target on the ground (distant-bottom condition), and at the line on the cycling path (near condition). The results showed that the standard deviation (SD) of the steering angle in the distant-bottom condition was smaller than that in the near condition. The SDs of lateral head flexion in the distant-upper and distant-bottom conditions were smaller than that in the near condition. The accuracy of the cycling trajectory was highest for near, followed by distant-bottom and distant-upper conditions, in that order. These findings suggest that directing gaze toward the far area during cycling enhances the stability of movements, whereas directing gaze toward the near area contributes to the control of the position in the path.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41454974What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.