ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Levator ani involvement in perianal fistulas: MRI-based insights into complex anatomy.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to characterize the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of perilevator fistulas involving the levator ani (LA) muscle and to evaluate whether anatomical or systemic factors are associated with LA involvement.
methodsA retrospective review of 1,697 pelvic MRI scans (2011-2025) identified 89 patients with perilevator fistulas. Patients were classified as LA (+) when the tract directly abutted any component of the levator ani and as LA (-) when separated by ischioanal fat. MRI evaluation included fistula type, orifice localization, associated complications, tract diameter, wall thickness, and morphometric features including the anorectal angle, anal canal length, and the thickness of the anal sphincters and intersphincteric groove. Clinical and etiologic data were also compared between groups. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of LA involvement. The discriminative performance of the final model was assessed using ROC curve analysis.
resultsSeventy-one patients (79.8%) had LA (+) and 18 (20.2%) had LA (-) fistulas. One-third of LA (+) tracts lacked an external orifice, ending as blind sinuses in deep pelvic planes. LA (+) fistulas were predominantly transsphincteric and cryptoglandular, whereas LA (-) fistulas were more often extrasphincteric and associated with inflammatory bowel disease. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that fistula type, etiology, and increased thickness of the fistulous wall and external anal sphincter (EAS) were independently associated with LA involvement, yielding an AUC of 0.938.
conclusionIn perilevator fistulas, transsphincteric configuration and increased thickness of the fistulous wall and EAS represent imaging factors associated with levator ani involvement, likely reflecting upward extension of sepsis along the outer sphincteric space. Accurate MRI mapping is essential for identifying hidden extensions and tailoring the most appropriate surgical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41454944What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.