Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41454792›Full record

ReviewClinical chemistry and laboratory medicine2026

From automation to agentic artificial intelligence in laboratory medicine: an opinion of the IFCC Division on Emerging Technologies.

Damien Gruson, Bernard Gouget, Woochang Lee, Ronda Greaves, Yan Liu, Sven Ebert, He Sarina Yang, Swarup Shah

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Damien GrusonDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Cliniques Universitaires St-Lux, Brussels, Belgium and Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Bernard GougetIFCC Division on Emerging Technologies, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8010-1404
Woochang LeeIFCC Division on Emerging Technologies, Milan, Italy.
Ronda GreavesIFCC Division on Emerging Technologies, Milan, Italy.
Yan LiuIFCC Division on Emerging Technologies, Milan, Italy.
Sven EbertIFCC Division on Emerging Technologies, Milan, Italy.
He Sarina YangDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Swarup ShahIFCC Division on Emerging Technologies, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1703-5990

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agentic artificial intelligence (AI) systems are distinguished by their ability to invoke multiple tools, compose command chains, and combine chain-of-thought reasoning with deep research to execute complex tasks and take actions. This represents a major evolution beyond machine learning and large language models (LLM), toward systems capable of planning, executing, and coordinating complex workflows. In contrast to traditional LLMs, which primarily focus on generating and classifying information, agentic AI introduces elements of autonomy, reasoning, and orchestration, while digital twins extend this concept to dynamic virtual representations of patients and laboratory processes, capable of continuous learning, simulation and adaptation. This transition has profound implications for laboratory medicine, a field characterized by high data complexity, multi-omics integration, and stringent operational demands. At the same time, laboratories face growing expectations regarding efficiency, resource stewardship, and value-based healthcare delivery. This article explores both the opportunities and limitations of agentic AI in laboratory medicine, highlighting its potential to move beyond static automation toward autonomous, outcome-driven innovation. It also examines the ethical, interpretability, and governance considerations that must accompany its implementation.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAutomationHumansMachine Learningagentic artificial intelligenceautonomous systemsclinical decision supportmulti-omics integrationvalue-based healthcareworkflow automation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.