ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2026
The role of fetal viability in perineal and anal sphincter injury: Insights from a large cohort study.
Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPerineal injury is a common complication of vaginal delivery with implications for maternal morbidity. Injuries range from minor lacerations to severe obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI). The role of fetal viability in perineal outcomes remains unclear.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary center (with approximately 13 000 annual deliveries). Eligible cases were singleton vaginal births ≥24 weeks and ≥ 500 g. Breech, vacuum-assisted deliveries, and episiotomies were excluded. Matching was performed by year of birth, parity, gestational age, birthweight, and epidural use. Analyses included matched and unmatched comparisons, as well as univariate and multivariate analyses.
resultsThe unmatched cohort comprised 86 341 viable and 598 non-viable births. Non-viable births occurred at lower gestational age (31.9 vs. 39.5 weeks, P < 0.001) and birthweight (1796 ± 920 vs. 3270 ± 435 g, P < 0.001), with lower spontaneous perineal injury rates (21.7% vs. 53.4%, P < 0.001). In the matched cohort (426 pairs), injury remained lower in non-viable births (29.1% vs. 36.2%, P = 0.028). OASI rates were similar (0.0% vs. 0.9%, P = 0.124). Multivariate analysis showed that non-viable status independently reduced risk of spontaneous perineal injury (odds ratio [OR] 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-0.57, P < 0.001). Other predictors included nulliparity (OR 4.57, 95% CI 4.40-4.72), birthweight (OR 1.64 per kg, 95% CI 1.57-1.71), and gestational age (OR 1.05 per week, 95% CI 1.04-1.06; all P < 0.001).
conclusionNon-viable fetal status was associated with reduced spontaneous perineal injury, although the effect lessened after adjusting for birthweight and gestational age. These findings suggest a potential fetal contribution to perineal injury mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.