ArticleThe British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology2026
Level-specific reliability coefficients from the perspective of latent state-trait theory.
Article in The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing popularity of the ecological momentary assessment method in psychological research requires adequate statistical models for intensive longitudinal data (ILD), with multilevel latent state-trait (ML-LST) models based on the latent state-trait theory revised (LST-R theory) as one possible alternative. Besides the traditional LST-R coefficients reliability, consistency and occasion-specificity, ML-LST models are also suitable for estimating reliability at Level 1 ("within-subject reliability") and Level 2 ("between-subject reliability"). However, these level-specific coefficients have not yet been defined in LST-R theory and, therefore, their interpretation has been unclear from the perspective of LST-R theory. In the current study, we discuss the interpretation and identification of these coefficients based on the (multilevel) versions of the Multistate-Singletrait (MSST), the Multistate-Indicator-specific trait (MSIT) and the Multistate-Singletrait model with M-1 correlated method factors (MSST-M-1). We show that, in the MSST-M-1 model, the between-subject coefficient is a measure of the indicator-unspecificity of an item (i.e. the portion of between-level variance that a specific item shares with a common trait) or the unidimensionality of a scale. Moreover, we highlight differences between occasion-specificity and within-subject reliability. The performance of the ML-MSST-M-1 model and the corresponding theoretical findings are illustrated using data from an experience sampling study on the within-person fluctuations of narcissistic admiration (Heyde et al., 2023).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.