Trial reportNeurorehabilitation and neural repair2026
Higher Intensity Walking Training in Individuals With Chronic Motor Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Concept of Shaping Applied to Locomotor Interventions: Clinical and Robotic Strategies to Facilitate and Progress Variable Stepping Training at Higher Intensities.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BackgroundThe amount of walking practice may influence locomotor recovery in individuals with motor incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI), although the contributions of exercise intensity are not well established.ObjectiveThe purpose of this blinded-assessor randomized trial was to determine the contributions of exercise intensity on locomotor outcomes in individuals >6 months following iSCI.MethodsAmbulatory individuals post-iSCI with walking speeds <1.0 m/s were assigned to ≤30 sessions of either high-intensity training (HIT: >70% heart rate [HR] reserve or ratings of perceived exertion [RPE] ≥15) or low-intensity training (LIT; <40% HR reserve; RPE ≤13). Assessments were performed at baseline, post-training, and at 3-month follow-up evaluation, with primary outcomes of fastest walking speeds over 10 m and during graded treadmill exercise tests, and secondary clinical and metabolic outcomes.ResultsOf 65 participants screened, 53 were randomized to HIT (n = 28) or LIT (n = 25) and completed 1489/1590 (94%) planned training sessions. Peak HRs and RPEs were greater during HIT (both
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.