Trial reportClinical and translational science2026
Population Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Prediction for Tebipenem Pivoxil Treatment of Pediatric Shigellosis.
Trial report in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Increasing antimicrobial resistance poses a serious challenge for the treatment of Shigella infections, and there is an urgent need for alternative antibacterial treatments. We conducted a clinical trial to investigate the efficacy of oral tebipenem pivoxil, compared to intravenous ceftriaxone, in Bangladeshi children with shigellosis. Using demographic data of 2249 Bangladeshi children with suspected shigellosis, population pharmacokinetic (PK) simulations were conducted to simulate tebipenem PK profiles in children with the proposed dosing regimen. Subsequently, the model predictions estimated each virtual participant's fraction of time over the 3-day treatment period during which simulated free tebipenem plasma concentration was above the minimum inhibitory concentration (fT > MIC). Variability associated with the prevalence of different Shigella species in Bangladeshi children and the MIC distributions were incorporated. Shigella treatment effect was assumed for participants that had fT > MIC for at least 40% of the 3-day treatment period (40% fT > MIC). The probability of achieving 40% fT > MIC was 86.4% for 4 mg/kg tebipenem pivoxil three times daily (TID) dosing and 92.4% with 3 mg/kg tebipenem pivoxil four times daily (QID) dosing. Lastly, the probability of tebipenem pivoxil being non-inferior to ceftriaxone, in a clinical trial containing 66 participants per arm, was evaluated for two dosing regimens. Three levels of ceftriaxone resistance were simulated to examine how dynamic ceftriaxone resistance may impact the trial outcome. Our findings suggest that more frequent tebipenem pivoxil dosing may increase the chance of producing treatment effects, contribute valuable insights to inform dosing strategy selection, and demonstrate a workflow that can be adapted to other drugs and diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.