Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41454484›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association2026

The interaction of tobacco retailer density and rurality with tobacco use prevalence in Kentucky.

Shyanika W Rose, W Jay Christian, Judy van de Venne, Delvon Mattingly, Bethany Shorey Fennell, Saber Feizy, Mary Kay Rayens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shyanika W RoseDepartment of Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4200-1197
W Jay ChristianDepartment of Epidemiology & Environmental Health, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Judy van de VenneCenter for Health, Engagement, and Transformation, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Delvon MattinglyDepartment of Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Bethany Shorey FennellMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Saber FeizyDepartment of Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5084-1965
Mary Kay RayensCollege of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.

Funding

AppalTRuST Project 3: Impact of proposed tobacco product rules in Appalachia on consumption and product switching with the Experimental Tobacco MarketplaceU54DA058256 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI Mary Kay Rayens · 2023 to 2026
$19.2M
Local Flavor Policies to Enhance Equity in Tobacco - A Diversity SupplementR01CA251478 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI ROSE, SHYANIKA W · 2021 to 2025
$3.0M
National Institutes of HealthNCI NIH HHS R01 CA251478NIDA NIH HHS U54 DA058256U.S. Food and Drug Administration
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTobacco retailer density is a key correlate of tobacco use prevalence in the United States, but this relationship has typically been examined in urban areas. We examined the relationship between retailer density and tobacco use across Kentucky counties, a state with high smoking rates and a substantial rural population.

methodsWe obtained a list of tobacco retailers from the 2021 Kentucky Synar program, used for minor's access inspections. We merged these data with county-level prevalence estimates for cigarette and smokeless tobacco use for each county in Kentucky, calculated using pooled 3-year estimates (2017-2019) of Kentucky Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data. We modeled county-level frequency of each outcome among adults as a function of tobacco retailer density and the Index of Relative Rurality, and interactions using ANCOVA, controlling for county percent of adult population and percent with an advanced degree.

findingsWe observed significant interactions between retailer density and rurality for both cigarette and smokeless tobacco use. Post-hoc protected pairwise comparisons demonstrated that within the 40 most urban counties, cigarette and smokeless tobacco use were significantly higher among counties with the highest retailer density, compared to low-density counties. Retailer density was not associated with the prevalence of cigarette and smokeless tobacco use within the 2 more rural tertiles of counties.

conclusionsConsistent with prior research, policies limiting tobacco retailer density could be most beneficial in urban and urban-adjacent areas, while other policies may need to be considered for rural areas, even within a relatively rural state such as Kentucky.

Indexed as

CommerceRural PopulationTobacco ProductsTobacco UseAdultBehavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemFemaleHumansKentuckyMalePrevalencerural populationstobacco retailerstobacco use

Identifiers

PMID41454484
PMCPMC12884400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.