ArticleCancer medicine2026
Tumor Control After Radiosurgery in Sporadic and Neurofibromatosis Type 2 Vestibular Schwannomas.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tumor Control After Radiosurgery in Sporadic and Neurofibromatosis Type 2 Vestibular Schwannomas.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe tumor control rate after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for neurofibromatosis type 2-associated vestibular schwannomas (NF2-VSs) compared to sporadic vestibular schwannomas (S-VSs) remains unclear. This nationwide, multicenter, retrospective study (KGKRS-21-001) aimed to clarify this issue.
methodsA total of 4718 patients treated with SRS for vestibular schwannomas were analyzed from 13 nationwide institutions in Korea. NF2-VS cases were propensity score-matched with S-VS cases at a ratio of 1:1, based on age, tumor volume, and marginal dose, resulting in 122 cases in each group.
resultsNo significant differences in age, tumor volume, or marginal dose were observed between the matched cohorts. The overall tumor control rates at 1, 3, and 10 years after SRS were 93.3%, 87.7%, and 80.7%, respectively, with no significant difference between NF2-VS and S-VS groups (p = 0.63). Subgroup analysis showed that age ≤ 19 years was a significant negative prognostic factor for tumor control in NF2-VS patients (p < 0.001), whereas no such correlation was found in the S-VS cohort (p = 0.78).
conclusionsSRS provides comparable tumor control for NF2-VSs and S-VSs. However, among NF2-VS patients, younger age (≤ 19 years) was associated with poorer tumor control, suggesting that age may be a critical factor in treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.