ArticleAnatomical sciences education2026
Blended and digital approaches in histology and pathology teaching: A scoping review.
Article in Anatomical sciences education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design thinking for transforming preclinical education: efficacy and implementation of a blended learning model in histology and embryology.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of blended learning versus conventional didactic teaching in pathology education outcomes.Bioinformation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Histology and pathology education is evolving, driven by the integration of digital microscopy with other technological advances. Gaining insight into the impact of this transition, while understanding the perspectives of both students and educators, is important for improving teaching practices. This includes mapping teaching methods, digital learning tools and assessment strategies in digital or blended learning environments, and exploring interactions between students and educators. This scoping review investigated how the integration of digital microscopy into histology and pathology education, and a shift to digital and blended learning, has impacted teaching and learning practices. Five databases were used in the search (PubMed, EMBASE, ERIC ProQuest, Web of Science, and Scopus), resulting in 98 included articles. The literature indicated that teaching methods have become more accessible, interactive, and student-centered than traditional instruction. Thirty studies described digital learning tools with digital microscopy, which were used by educators for teaching and by students for independent studies. Image-based quizzes and formative feedback for self-evaluation were frequently reported assessment methods. The lack of physical interaction between students, peers and educators was reported to be a disadvantage of digital learning. Several studies identified blended approaches as a possible solution to maintain accessible digital teaching while preserving valuable student-educator interactions. This review discusses the findings within a broader perspective, identifies opportunities to enhance the learning experience for educators and medical students, and addresses diverse needs to guide the future development of digital learning tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.