ArticleBMC psychology2025
Strict nonselective quarantine and the prediction of suicidal thinking, hopelessness, and substance use in undergraduates: A longitudinal natural experiment 1000 km from a COVID-19 outbreak.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe costs of quarantine on mental health are difficult to quantify and disentangle from primary and secondary effects of infectious disease. Selective and nonselective quarantines were widely used public health measures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Opportunity arose to test by longitudinal natural experiment the hypothesis that nonselective quarantine predicts elevated suicidal thinking, hopelessness, and drug use in a sample that was almost certainly not concurrently exposed to the COVID-19 virus.
methodsUndergraduates (18- to 22-years) studying psychology in Dunedin, New Zealand, completed a prospective online survey (10 assessment waves, at 3-day intervals) of passive and active suicidal ideation (past 3 days), current hopelessness, and same-day recreational drug use. During the study, detection of one case of COVID-19 in a community that was 1060 km from the study site triggered a strict nationwide 14-day quarantine, implemented with fewer than 6-hours’ notice. Bayesian growth modelling was used to quantify direct and mediated (indirect) effects of the quarantine period.
resultsOf 283 completing baseline assessment, 38.5% (95% CI, 32.8, 44.2) reported past-month ideation and 35.0% (95% CI, 29.4, 40.5) past-fortnight drug use. Retention during follow-up was 89% (n = 253) to 95% (n = 269). At each follow-up, 12.3% to 19.9% reported interval ideation and 1.9% to 4.7% reported drug use. Quarantine predicted a 0.13 standard deviation increase in hopelessness. Quarantine did not directly predict ideation or drug use. However, quarantine had an indirect effect on ideation that was mediated by hopelessness. Among those with average hopelessness, predicted rates of ideation in and out of quarantine were 17.9% and 16.7%, respectively.
conclusionsA nationwide nonselective quarantine predicted increased hopelessness and, in turn, hopelessness predicted small increases in suicidal thinking among emerging adults. The observed effects are unlikely to be attributable to active COVID-19 infection. Public health interventions that ignore developmental, resource, and mental health differences within populations may harm those who are most vulnerable within communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.