Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41454400›Full record

Trial reportTrials2025

Satisfactory perioperative management for hip arthroscopy with small local pericapsular nerve group block: a single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Chong Zhang, Yixin Fan, Peiyu Li, Mi Su

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chong ZhangDepartment of Anesthesia, Sichuan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital (Chengdu Sports Hospital and Chengdu Research Institute for Sports Injury), Chengdu, China. 1019403593@qq.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-7476-3710
Yixin Fan *Chengdu BOE Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Peiyu Li *Department of Anesthesia, Sichuan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital (Chengdu Sports Hospital and Chengdu Research Institute for Sports Injury), Chengdu, China.
Mi Su *Department of Anesthesia, Sichuan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital (Chengdu Sports Hospital and Chengdu Research Institute for Sports Injury), Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent analgesic options for hip arthroscopy include fascia iliaca block and peripheral nerve block of the hip. Although the latter provides effective analgesia with reduced motor impairment compared with the fascia iliaca approach, motor blockade still occurs in ≥ 25% of patients. This study aimed to investigate whether administering low-volume local anesthetic for peripheral nerve blockade in the hip reduces the incidence of postoperative quadriceps weakness while maintaining adequate pain control.

methodsA total of 90 patients who underwent hip arthroscopy were randomly assigned to one of three groups. The first group was administered a fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB), the second group was administered a pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block with 20 ml of local anesthetic, and the third group was administered a PENG block with 10 ml of local anesthetic. The primary outcome measure was postoperative quadriceps muscle strength, whereas the secondary outcome measures were the postoperative 2-h Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score, intraoperative changes in blood pressure and heart rate, NRS score at one day after surgery, intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, patient satisfaction, pain experience, and quality of recovery.

resultsNo evidence of a difference were observed in the basic statistical parameters among the three patient groups. Moreover, no significant discrepancies were identified in the NRS scores at the 2-h or 1-day post-operative intervals. However, a marked difference in quadriceps muscle strength was evident among the three groups at the 2-h post-operative mark (PENG 10 ml = 3.43 ± 0.45, PENG 20 ml = 2.43 ± 1.81, FICB = 0.57 ± 0.82; p < 0.001). There was a difference in the quality of postoperative recovery (PENG 10 ml = 125.57 ± 4.70, PENG 20 ml = 123.53 ± 5.45, FICB = 120.80 ± 3.34; p < 0.01), with no significant difference in any other outcome.

conclusionsIn patients undergoing hip arthroscopy, preoperative FICB, PENG (10 mL), and PENG (20 mL) blocks resulted in comparable intraoperative stress responses and provided comparable, satisfactory postoperative analgesia.However, patients who received low-volume PENG blocks demonstrated superior postoperative preservation of quadriceps muscle strength and a statistically significant improvement in the quality of recovery. Notably, the magnitude of this improvement in recovery quality did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2400091099. Date: October 21, 2024; retrospectively registered. URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/ .

Indexed as

Anesthetics, LocalArthroscopyHip JointNerve BlockPerioperative CarePostoperative PainAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle StrengthMuscle WeaknessPain MeasurementPatient SatisfactionAnesthetics, LocalFascia iliaca compartment blockHip arthroscopy;pericapsular nerve blockLow-volume local anestheticMuscle strength

Identifiers

PMID41454400
PMCPMC12853920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.