Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41454392›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Global market and supply chain implications of the European Union medical device regulation 2017/745 as amended by 2023/607.

Thelma Marley, Deirdre Barrow, Olivia McDermott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thelma MarleyCollege of Science & Engineering, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Deirdre BarrowCollege of Science & Engineering, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Olivia McDermottCollege of Science & Engineering, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland. olivia.mcdermott@universityofgalway.ie.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The release of the European Union Medical Device Regulations (EU MDR) has introduced many complexities for medical device manufacturers and has had implications for their global markets; one such complexity was the unforeseen consequence of the impact which the MDR has imposed on country registrations held outside the European jurisdiction, as certain countries abridge the Conformité Européene (CE) mark for market authorization purposes. This study focuses on the global implications for medical device manufacturers regarding the implementation of the MDR. It discusses whether the amending regulations will influence positive change regarding the MDR transition or introduce any unintended consequences. A regulatory assessment of a large enterprise medical device manufacturer’s global markets was conducted to assess the impact of the MDR on its globally commercialized products. A subsequent qualitative study was carried out with 15 other European based Medtech organizations to benchmark their understanding of the MDR effects on their global products and ascertain what actions, if any, needed to be taken prior to MDR certification. The MDRs has affected the availability of European-manufactured devices globally and has led to increased administration and workload in maintaining product registrations. While only 15 organizations were interviewed, the challenges identified were representative of the EU Medtech community and the global regulatory landscape in which these organizations operated at a point in time pre the amending regulations. This study can help develop key recommendations for manufacturers to consider in their certifications transition to MDR, as well as educating policymakers on the impact of the MDR on the global market and aiding in a lessons learned review by the EU of how the regulations were scoped and deployed in terms of effects on the manufacturers. Understanding the effect and implications of the EU MDRs on global markets will assist in the generation of an appropriate help develop global regulatory strategies, which in turn to ensure that there is no shortage of critical and life-saving devices across all markets. This study is the first of its kind to capture the effects of MDR on European medical device manufacturers’ globally commercialized products and product portfolios, detailing its effects at a point in time. The study has implications for theory and practice: academics can leverage it to understand the MDR from Manufacturing, Supply Chain, and Marketing viewpoints, and European policymakers can use it to take further action and study lessons learned.

Indexed as

CommerceEquipment and SuppliesMedical Device LegislationEuropean UnionHumansQualitative ResearchAbridgmentFree sale certificateMedical device regulations, Europe

Identifiers

PMID41454392
PMCPMC12849135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.