ArticleSystematic reviews2025
Experiences, barriers, and enablers of infant and young child feeding among adolescent mothers in Sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review protocol.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis scoping review protocol aims to examine the current evidence base on the experiences, barriers, and facilitators of infant and young child feeding (IYCF) among adolescent mothers in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). The review will help to identify the nature and extent of available research in this area and highlight evidence and knowledge gaps for future research. The work is significant because of the urgent need to understand the unique challenges faced by adolescent mothers in SSA and inform the development of evidence-based interventions to improve IYCF practices.
methodsThe review will be guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A comprehensive search strategy will be employed to identify relevant studies from electronic databases, grey literature, and additional sources. Four independent reviewers will conduct study selection, data extraction, and quality appraisal. Bronfenbrenner's bioecological model system levels will be used as a guiding framework to code, interpret and frame the results by identifying experiences, barriers, and enablers influencing IYCF practices at microsystem, mesosystem, exosystem, and macrosystem levels. Furthermore, the review will highlight gaps in existing literature, providing valuable insights for future research and evidence-based interventions. DISCUSSION: The study is aligned with global efforts to address child malnutrition and emphasizes the importance of evidence-based interventions in SSA and findings will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentation at national and international conferences. The protocol has been registered prospectively on the Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/h7kzw ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.