ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2025
Determination of energy consumption during kangoo jumps exercises in women engaged in recreational sport.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the effect of kangoo jumps activity on energy expenditure in women participating in kangoo jumps activities.
methodsThirteen women participated in the study on the basis of voluntary participation. In line with the measurements made, a portable gas analyzer (Cortex Metamax 3B) was used to reach the findings (MET, HR (min), VO2 (L/min), VO2/kg (ml/min/kg), RER, VE (L/min), FAT (g/h), VCO2 (L/min)). The values of the music used at 103 bpm (Phase 1) and 128 bpm (Phase 2) were fixed with the help of sound engineers and music was used. In the statistical evaluation of the data, an independent sample t-test was used based on the phase variable and the significance level was accepted as (p≤0.05).
resultAs a result of the research, there were significant differences found between Phase 1 (aerobic) and Phase 2 (anaerobic) according to MET (t(0.05) = -27.4; p < 0.05), HR (min) (t(0.05) = -21.0; p < 0.05), VO2 (L/min) (t(0.05) = -27.2; p < 0.05), VO2/kg (ml/min/kg) (t(0.05) = -27.4; p < 0.05), RER (t(0.05) = -23.7; p < 0.05), VE (L/min) (t(0.05) = -25.8; p < 0.05), FAT (g/h) (t(0.05) = -19.5; p < 0.05), and VCO2 (L/min) (t(0.05) = -25.8; p < 0.05) variables.
conclusionKangoo jumps activity was evaluated as an activity whose intensity can be adjusted according to different physical fitness levels of many individuals and can meet their energy consumption needs.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.