SynthesisBMC women's health2025
Association of cervical cancer and intrauterine device use: a narrative review.
Synthesis in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although intrauterine devices (IUDs) are widely used as a contraceptive method, their association with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia remains a subject of debate. Some studies suggest a potential protective effect, possibly through local immune modulation, while others report no significant association. Evidence, however, remains scarce and inconsistent, particularly regarding long-term IUDs use. Our study aims to address these gaps by exploring the relationship between IUDs use and cervical cancer within the broader context of cervical cancer prevention. We conducted a narrative review by searching the PubMed, Scopus, LILACS, and Cochrane databases, utilizing a combination of text and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms. The search terms included "intrauterine contraception," "intrauterine devices," "hormonal intrauterine device," "IUD," "LNG-IUS" (levonorgestrel intrauterine system), and "cervical cancer," "cervical lesions," and "cervical cancer risk," for publications available up to July 2024. Our review included 16 studies of fair to good quality, employing rigorous methodologies and addressing key confounding variables to evaluate the association between IUDs use and the risk of cervical cancer. Among these, eight studies reported that IUD use was associated with a lower risk of cervical cancer, while six studies identified a trend toward reduced risk, although without significant differences. Conversely, two studies found an association between IUD use and a higher risk of cervical cancer. A critical limitation in many of these studies was the lack of information regarding the specific type of IUD used by the study populations. These findings underscore the need for further research to clarify the association between IUDs use and cervical cancer risk, with a focus on long-term outcomes and stratification by IUD type.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.