ArticleBMC neurology2025
Brain networks activated when aggravating baseline chronic pain of an individual with new daily persistent headache: a case study.
Article in BMC neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study we examined neuronal mechanisms associated with chronic headache pain by recruiting a participant diagnosed with New Daily Persistent Headache (NDPH), who had the reliable characteristic that his baseline chronic pain could be immediately and consistently modulated (partially relieved or aggravated) by applying deep pressure to specific locations along his face and head. We sought to map brain regions responsive to modulations of his baseline pain using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We constructed customized MRI-compatible 3D-printed face masks and skull plates affixed with syringe plungers that could apply and remove deep pressure to discrete craniofacial locations. Using On/Off block paradigms, we collected fMRI data across nine sessions while pressing on locations that either increased, decreased, or had no effect on his chronic pain. Although displacement artifacts precluded use of relief point data, we did reveal five brain regions that showed significantly increased responses when stimulating locations that aggravated his baseline headache pain, including the right anterior insula, bilateral inferior parietal lobule (IPL) foci, plus bilateral cerebellar regions (lobule VIIIb). Using structural vector autoregression (Granger causality), resting-state functional connectivity MRI analyses of the above somatosensory-related aggravated pain network further revealed effective connectivity (positive effect paths) from the left IPL to the right anterior insula, and these two regions had positive effect paths to the right IPL. This cortical circuit was coupled with the cerebellar foci plus the participant’s anatomically derived periaqueductal gray (PAG) region. Moreover, on days when the participant had greater degrees of baseline chronic headache pain the right IPL and PAG exhibited negative effect paths on the left IPL and left cerebellum, respectively, thereby revealing additional psychophysiological attributes of this circuit. Together, these results not only identified candidate targets for patient-customized neuromodulation therapies but also revealed a novel testable circuit model regarding potential mechanisms underlying one form of neuropathic pain perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.