Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41454303›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Testing the use of a biomarker (PlGF) to evaluate superimposed preeclampsia in pregnant women with chronic hypertension (B.I.P.E.S.): a randomized clinical trial study protocol.

Rodolfo Rosa Japecanga, Juliana da-Costa-Santos, Guilherme Moraes Nobrega, Ana Beatriz Sousa, Fernando Guimarães, Fernanda G Surita, José Paulo de Siqueira Guida, Maria Laura Costa

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rodolfo Rosa JapecangaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Juliana da-Costa-SantosDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Guilherme Moraes NobregaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Ana Beatriz SousaSchool of Nursing, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), São Paulo, Campinas, Brazil.
Fernando GuimarãesCentro de Atenção À Saúde da Mulher (CAISM), Women's Hospital Prof. Dr. José Aristodemo Pinotti, Universidade Estadual de Campinas 13083891, SP, Campinas, Brazil.
Fernanda G SuritaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
José Paulo de Siqueira GuidaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Maria Laura CostaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil. mlaura@unicamp.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlacental growth factor (PlGF) is a promising biomarker for differential diagnosis between worsening chronic hypertension (CH) and superimposed preeclampsia (SPE) after 20 weeks of gestation. The aim of this study is to compare maternal and perinatal outcomes and costs in suspected cases of SPE, evaluated with and without the use of PlGF, for clinical management in women with CH.

methodsRandomized Clinical Trial (RCT). Pregnant women with CH and suspected SPE (due to worsening blood pressure control, excessive weight gain, onset or worsening of proteinuria, or signs of placental insufficiency after 20 weeks of gestation) will be eligible. Exclusion criteria: diagnosis of severe disease (HELLP syndrome, eclampsia, signs of imminent eclampsia, hypertensive crisis, or acute fetal distress). The calculated sample size is 140 women with an estimated inclusion period of 12 months. Eligible women will be invited to participate and will be randomly selected for standard follow-up or intervention (rapid PlGF test) in addition to the routine laboratory protocol for investigating SPE. The test result will be made available to the healthcare professionals within 30 min. When PlGF is considered normal (value ≥ 100 pg/ml), woman will be discharged for outpatient follow-up scheduled in 7 or 14 days (depending on gestational age (GA)). Cases with abnormal PlGF (between 12 and 100 pg/ml) will be evaluated as probable SPE, with hospitalization or early follow-up, and cases with suggestive severe placental insufficiency (PlGF < 12 pg/ml) will be hospitalized for strict maternal–fetal surveillance. Primary outcome will be the frequency of preterm childbirth. Maternal and perinatal outcomes, length of hospital stay, outpatient follow-up visits, serial collection of exams and costs of suspected cases of SPE, with and without the use of the rapid PlGF test (Quidel-Triage) will be compared. DISCUSSION: The use of PlGF may contribute to better distinguishing between SPE and CH and therefore avoiding medically indicated preterm delivery and other surveillance interventions during follow-up.

trial registrationThis protocol was registered on REBEC (The Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials) platform under the code RBR-2zx5y9r in 07/09/2024.

Indexed as

HypertensionPlacenta Growth FactorPre-EclampsiaAdultBiomarkersChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBiomarkersPGF protein, humanPlacenta Growth FactorChronic HypertensionPlGF biomarkerPregnancySuperimposed preeclampsia

Identifiers

PMID41454303
PMCPMC12977778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.