ArticleBMC cancer2025
Identification and prioritization of high-frequency biomarkers and therapeutic targets in gastric cancer trials.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- KLRB1 gene in tumor immune regulation and disease prognosis: a multidimensional role review.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Preoperative Prediction of High Mitotic Count in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Using CT Features and Serologic Indicators: An Interpretable Model with Multicenter External Validation.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastric cancer (GC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. An investigation of clinical trials and therapeutic targets for GC was conducted.
methodsUsing the Trialtrove database, we anlyzed global and Chinese clinical trials on GC. Subsequently, we investigated oxaliplatin, S-1, apatinib, nivolumab, and sintilimab, alongside associated oncogenic biomarkers and therapeutic targets. The safety of these targets was evaluated through a joint analysis of the GTEx-RNA, HPA-RNA, and HPA-Proteins datasets. Finally, we assessed their specificity and clinical prospects using HPA pathology and CPTAC data.
resultsCurrently, global clinical trials on GC are primarily concentrated in China (> 50%) and the United States. Since the survival benefit of HER2-positive GC targeted therapy was first confirmed in 2010. Trastuzumab received FDA approval, targeted and immunotherapies have played a pivotal role in both monotherapy and combination treatment of GC. Nivolumab, Trastuzumab, and China-developed anticancer agents such as apatinib and sintilimab are now being used in combination with traditional chemotherapeutic drugs like oxaliplatin and S-1 for GC treatment. At present, only PD-1, VEGFR2, and HER2 are approved GC therapeutic targets. Our analysis indicates that most potential targets exhibit poor safety and low specificity. However, FGFR2, CTLA4, and TROP demonstrate favorable safety and specificity profiles, suggesting promising potential for GC targeted therapy and prognostic monitoring.
conclusionsBy analyzing the clinical trial landscape and the safety and specificity of therapeutic targets for GC, this study offers a reference for future clinical investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.