ArticleBMC neurology2025
Identification of distinct symptom profiles in primary brain tumor patients: a prospective longitudinal study.
Article in BMC neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSymptom burden in primary brain tumor patients varies, emphasizing the need for comprehensive understanding to improve patient care. This study aims to identify distinct symptom clusters among brain tumor patients in Shanghai, China, using Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) to guide personalized diagnosis, treatment, and supportive care.
methodsA longitudinal study was conducted among 161 patients with primary brain tumors in Shanghai. Participants completed the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor Module (MDASI-BT) at three intervals: the day of admission (T1), three days after surgery (T2), and two weeks after surgery (T3). Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) was used to identify subgroups with unique symptom patterns.
resultsSix distinct subgroups were identified (entropy = 0.964), ranging from low-burden to persistently severe patterns. Subgroup membership was partially associated with age, tumor grade, and diagnosis. These subgroups were: transient postoperative burden group, stable symptom with cognitive emergence group, distress-predominant, low burden group, elderly-high grade, persistently severe group, nausea-dominant recovery group, and distress-plus-nausea, younger urban group.
conclusionOur findings reveal substantial heterogeneity in perioperative symptom experiences among brain tumor patients. Identifying subgroups with high and persistent symptom burden may help clinicians target interventions such as enhanced education, proactive monitoring, rehabilitation, psychological support, and antiemetic management. This subgroup-based approach may improve quality of life, reduce morbidity, and guide precision supportive care in neuro-oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.