ArticleBMC public health2025
Breaking boundaries: integration of sports and medicine in the community elderly service model.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development of an evaluation framework for a lifestyle management model among Chinese MASLD patients under the concept of physical and medical integration.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChina possesses the largest aging population globally and is experiencing the most rapid demographic transitions, presenting substantial public health challenges. In response, the Healthy China strategy has emphasized the integration of sports and medicine as a key initiative for monitoring and promotion, with a particular focus on community services. This study employed grounded theory classification coding to identify core concepts and key factors. It systematically constructed a theoretical model for integrating sports and medicine into community elderly services, while conducting a developmental pathway analysis that compares major international models with China's practical approach. The overarching aim was to jointly advance public health and enhance the nation's overall well-being.
methodsUtilizing grounded theory and NVivo, this study analyzed policies, reports, and cases related to the integration of sports medicine. Through open, axial, and selective coding with constant comparative analysis, it identified key factors of integrated model services. Consequently, a theoretical framework and operational model were constructed for China, elucidating contextual conditions, stakeholder interactions, multi-actor collaboration, and implementation pathways for community-dwelling older adults. DISCUSSION: This study delineates the operational characteristics, performance outcomes, and bottlenecks of four service typologies. It offers critical appraisal of their respective merits and limitations, while emphasizing how policy directives steer their development. This comparative synthesis substantiates the practical feasibility and conceptual robustness of the proposed model, demonstrating its capacity to enhance integrated community-based service delivery.
conclusionA total of 355,796 characters of text were included, resulting in the construction of 981 coding reference points, identified 13 critical categories and the core concepts underpinning the integration of sports and medicine services for the elderly. The proposal of four distinct and innovative community integration models: the Sports-led Model, the Medicine-led Model, the Technology-driven Model, and the Talent-driven Model. These models offer specific and actionable guidance for developing diversified and efficient elderly health services within the community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.