Observational studyBMC cardiovascular disorders2025
New electrocardiographic changes as predictors of acute coronary interventions in the emergency department: a retrospective observational study.
Observational study in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundElectrocardiograms (EKGs) are integral to the early evaluation of chest pain in the emergency department (ED), and the HEART score is frequently used for risk stratification of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, the HEART score typically relies on static EKG assessments, overlooking recent EKG changes that may reveal evolving ischemia. This study investigates the association between serial EKG changes and the need for urgent cardiac interventions, assessing whether integrating serial EKG data can enhance the predictive accuracy of the HEART score.
methodsWe conducted a single-center retrospective observational study of ED patients who presented at least twice with chest pain or equivalent symptoms from 2019 to 2023. Eligible patients had serial EKGs and documented HEART scores. New EKG changes were categorized into three groups: (1) new common ischemic patterns (e.g., T-wave inversions, ST-T segment depressions); (2) pseudo-normalization (e.g., resolution of prior abnormalities); and (3) new uncommon ischemic patterns (e.g., QT prolongation, U waves, LBBB, etc.). The primary outcome was the requirement for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Propensity score matching was used to control confounding factors. Inter-rater agreement for EKG classification was assessed using Cohen's kappa.
resultsAmong 1,862 patients, 149 (8.0%) underwent PCI/CABG interventions. New EKG changes were observed in nearly 80% of patients who required intervention, compared with less than 30% of those who did not (p < 0.001). The most frequent patterns were T-wave inversions and ST-T depressions. Despite higher HEART scores in the intervention group, 10.7% were misclassified as low risk under traditional scoring.
conclusionsNew EKG changes may be strongly associated with the need for PCI/CABG and provide prognostic value beyond static EKG interpretation. Relying solely on traditional HEART scoring may underestimate risk in a significant subset of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.