ArticleBMC public health2025
How much do socioeconomic inequalities explain gender- and ethnicity-based gaps in health coverage? A decomposition analysis of Chinese migrant workers, 2009-2018.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHealth coverage equality is key to equal healthcare access. In China, the Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance (UEBMI) is a compulsory health coverage for people employed in urban areas and provides the best access to healthcare. Having the UEBMI is thus crucial for rural-to-urban migrant workers, the lack thereof indicates not only informal employment, but also unequal healthcare access, particularly for their vulnerable subgroups. This study aims to explore factors that contribute to UEBMI coverage gaps between gender and ethnicity migrant worker subgroups. The findings provide insights on targeted social policies to reduce inequalities in the most vulnerable subgroups.
methodsUsing the population-based, nationally representative data from the China Migrant Dynamics Survey from 2009 to 2018, we assessed the UEBMI coverage rate status gaps in China’s migrant worker gender and ethnic subgroups. Socioeconomic determinants were education level, household income and occupation. Using probit regression models, we applied the Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition method to examine the extent to which gender and ethnicity disparities could be explained by socioeconomic gradients in UEBMI coverage rate status.
resultsOne million, one hundred ninety-nine thousand, and thirteen participants were included in our study, 46.9% (n = 561 808) were women, 7.8% (n = 93 934) were of ethnic minority group, and average age was 34.6 (± 10.2) years. Women (16.67%, 95% CI [16.54 – 16.79]) showed higher UEBMI coverage than men (15.93%, 95% CI [15.83 – 16.03]), and ethnic minority showed lower coverage rate (12.09%, 95% CI [11.85 – 12.34]) than Han majority (16.59%, 95% CI [16.50 – 16.67]). Decomposition analysis indicated education was the major contributor to the UEBMI differences between gender and ethnicity groups. Having a Bachelor’s degree was the major contributor. If the subgroups had equally attained Bachelor’s degree education, the coverage gap would enlarge between men and women by 66.87%, but the coverage gap would be reduced between ethnic minority and Han majority groups by 17.57%. Age and occupation type were the major contributors in UEBMI differences between men and women; living in western region would close the UEBMI gap between ethnic minority and Han majority groups.
conclusionsOur study found differences in UEBMI coverage rate status between Chinese migrant worker gender and ethnicity subgroups. Our findings contribute to targeted policy strategies to enhance UEBMI coverage equality, thereby reducing healthcare access inequalities in rural-to-urban migrant worker subgroups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.