Observational studyBMC infectious diseases2025
Pediatric drug-sensitive tuberculosis treatment regimen profiles and treatment outcomes in mainland China, 2017-2022: a multi-center study.
Observational study in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite the establishment of WHO treatment guidelines for childhood tuberculosis (TB), evaluation of TB treatment regimens for children in real-world settings in China remained limited, particularly regarding treatment duration, utilization of second-line anti-TB drugs (SLDs), and adverse events. This study aimed to describe the treatment protocols for childhood TB in China.
methodsA multi-center retrospective observational study was conducted at ten state-mandated TB referral hospitals across four regions in China during 2017-2022. Children with drug-susceptible TB who were hospitalized and under 15 years-old were enrolled. And their clinical information, including diagnosis, treatment regimen, duration, adverse events and treatment response, were collected by professional pediatricians through the hospital medical records system and telephone follow-ups.
resultsA total of 597 children were included, about 75% of children were pulmonary TB (PTB)-only; the remaining 25% children were diagnosed with extrapulmonary TB (EPTB). In total, 63.5% of all children treated on a standard core regimen (HRZ(E)/HR(E)) while 27.8% were on a regimen that included SLDs and 8.71% were on other regimens. 67.0% of PTB-only patients received a standard core regimen, while 41.7% of EPTB patients were on regimens including at least one SLDs. Duration of regimen varied by form of TB: 72.4% of PTB-only patients and 90.1% of EPTB patients received a regimen longer than six months. Among EPTB patients, extended treatment was most common in those with severe manifestations-such as meningitis and osteoarticular TB-with median durations of 18.2 months and 12.7 months, respectively. The treatment success rates for children with PTB-only and with EPTB were 96.5% and 94.4%, respectively. A total of 133 (22.3%) children experienced adverse reactions. Treatment duration exceeding 12 months (OR: 5.52, P < 0.01) and inclusion of SLDs (OR: 2.67, P < 0.01) were significantly associated with increased odds of adverse reactions.
conclusionIn our study, a relatively proportion of pediatric drug-sensitive TB received extended duration regimens, and SLDs were often incorporated for cases of EPTB. While the treatment regimens resulted in few unfavorable outcomes, they were associated with a relatively high frequency of side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.