Observational studyBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Shoulder kinematic and muscle recruitment pattern changes in upper trapezius myofascial trigger points: a controlled observational study.
Observational study in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMyofascial trigger points (MTrPs) in the upper trapezius are prevalent in individuals with shoulder pain and may interfere with neuromuscular control and kinematics during shoulder movements. The purpose of this study was to compare shoulder muscle activation patterns and kinematic parameters, particularly scapulohumeral rhythm (SHR), between individuals with upper trapezius MTrPs and the healthy group during shoulder abduction.
methodsAn observational study was conducted with participants assigned to either a trigger point group (n = 15) or a healthy group (n = 13). Surface electromyography (EMG) recorded activation of eight shoulder muscles during abduction. Kinematic analysis quantified SHR, scapular, and glenohumeral motion. Statistical comparisons were made using independent t-tests with SPSS version 17, considering a p-value of less than 0.05 as significant.
resultsNo statistically significant differences were observed in peak EMG amplitudes, onset timing, or root mean squared activity between groups for any muscle ( p > 0.05). However, the trigger point group exhibited a significantly prolonged rise time (1.21 ± 0.51) compared with the healthy group (0.68 ± 0.39; d = 0.90, p < 0.001), as well as an increased SHR (4.84 ± 0.77) compared with the healthy group (4.23 ± 0.50; d = 0.90, p = 0.026), respectively. These findings suggest a disruption in glenohumeral-scapular coordination, potentially indicative of compensatory neuromuscular adaptations associated with the presence of trigger points. Other kinematic variables, including maximum scapular upward rotation and anterior tilt, did not differ significantly.
conclusionUpper trapezius MTrPs are associated with increased SHR and prolonged rise time during abduction, reflecting altered shoulder coordination. Combining kinematic assessments with advanced EMG timing analyses may provide more sensitive markers of subtle neuromuscular changes associated with MTrPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.