ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Development, validation, and visualization of a machine learning-based predictive model for depression risk in sleep disorder patients.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Differentiation between depressive disorder and insomnia disorder with depressive symptoms across age groups using machine learning.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to develop, validate, and visualize a novel machine learning (ML)-based predictive model for depression risk in patients with sleep disorders.
methodsUsing data from the NHANES (2005–2020), 11 machine learning models were constructed, including Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), Ridge Regression (Ridge), Elastic Net (ENet), Light Gradient Boosting Machine(LightGBM), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Decision Tree (DT), XGBoost, Logistic Regression (LR), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP). Model performance was evaluated using multiple metrics. Decision Curve Analysis (DCA) and calibration curves were used to assess the clinical applicability of the models. SHAP values were applied for model interpretation, and an online web calculator was developed for further model visualization.
resultsAmong the 11 machine learning models, the LightGBM model demonstrated the best performance with an AUC of 0.73. Calibration curves for both the training and test sets confirmed the model’s good calibration. The SHAP summary plot showed that the top three important features in the model were age, poverty-income ratio (PIR), and marital status. The model was integrated into an interactive web application that allows clinicians to predict depression risk based on 10 key clinical variables.
conclusionThis study successfully developed a predictive model for depression risk in patients with sleep disorders, demonstrating strong discriminatory ability and good clinical applicability. The online application provides clinicians with a user-friendly tool to assess depression risk and guide targeted prevention and intervention strategies. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER : Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.