Observational studyBMC infectious diseases2025
Optimizing diagnosis of Bacillus cereus bacteremia using time to positivity: a retrospective observational study to differentiate true bacteremia from contamination.
Observational study in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBacillus cereus can occasionally cause invasive infections, irrespective of the host's immune status. However, the presence of B. cereus in a single blood culture is typically considered a contaminant, potentially leading to an underestimation of the true incidence of B. cereus bacteremia. This study aimed to evaluate the cut-off value for time to positivity (TTP) to distinguish true bacteremia from contamination.
methodsThis single-center retrospective study included patients with positive blood cultures for B. cereus between November 2011 and February 2025. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated to evaluate the diagnostic performance of TTP, which was achieved by plotting the sensitivity (the true-positive rate) on the y-axis against 1 - specificity (the false-positive rate) on the x-axis for a series of potential TTP cut-off points.
resultsDuring the study period, 49 patients were enrolled, of whom 18 were classified into the true bacteremia group and 31 into the contamination group. All patients had at least two sets of blood cultures collected. The median TTP was significantly shorter among patients in the true bacteremia group (7.8 h; interquartile range [IQR], 6.5-8.9) than in the contamination group (11.2 h; IQR, 9.9-13) (p < 0.001). ROC curve analysis indicated that a cutoff value of 9.0 h achieved the highest sensitivity (77.8%) and specificity (90.3%) for predicting true bacteremia, while a more lenient threshold of TTP > 13.0 h yielded 100% sensitivity for identifying contamination.
conclusionsA cut-off value of 9.0 h can differentiate true B. cereus bacteremia from contamination, whereas a TTP > 13 h is indicative of contamination. Given its suboptimal diagnostic accuracy, TTP can help differentiate true B. cereus bacteremia from contamination but should be interpreted with clinical and laboratory data for the diagnosis of sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.