ArticleScientific reports2025
Low HBV replication does not aggravate disease progression in patients with superinfection with HEV.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In China, co-infection with HEV and HBV is relatively common, and the impact of low HBV DNA load on coinfected patients remains unknown. This study aimed to assess the effect of low-replication hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection on disease progression in patients with hepatitis E virus (HEV) superinfection. This study included 260 consecutive patients diagnosed with sporadic acute hepatitis E (AHE) who were admitted to two hospitals in Jiangsu Province, China, between January 2018 and December 2023. Patients were categorized into two groups: those who were HBsAg-positive with low HBV replication (defined as HBV DNA levels < 2000 IU/mL) and those who were HBsAg-negative. Clinical and laboratory data were retrospectively collected and analyzed to evaluate biochemical parameters, disease progression, and clinical outcomes across the two groups. Of the 260 patients, 24 (9.23%) were HBsAg-positive, while 236 (90.77%) were HBsAg-negative. The average age of participants was 53.48 ± 13.3 years, with no significant differences in age or gender between the two groups. Liver damage manifestations and biochemical indicators were comparable at admission and throughout follow-up. Importantly, there were no significant differences in disease progression or clinical outcomes between the groups. The cumulative rates of liver enzyme and bilirubin normalization were also similar. Although the follow-up period was longer in the HBsAg-positive group (442.79 ± 474.58 days vs. 215.65 ± 346.11 days, P = 0.031), no differences in clinical outcomes were identified. In this retrospective cohort, low replication HBV infection did not appear to significantly influence short-term disease progression in patients with HEV superinfection, though larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.