ArticleScientific reports2025
Parametric analysis of electromagnetic wave interactions with layered biological tissues for varying frequency, polarization, and fat thickness.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Electromagnetic wave interaction with biological tissue is frequency-, angle-, and polarization-dependent, influencing both dosimetric parameters and resultant thermal effects. This work presents a comprehensive analysis across the major ISM bands (433, 915, 2450, and 5800 MHz) for transverse electric (TE) and transverse magnetic (TM) polarizations incident on a three-layer tissue model (skin-fat-muscle). A custom MATLAB code was developed to integrate the multilayer transmission line formalism, polarization-specific wave impedance modeling, Cole-Cole dielectric parameterization, and a finite difference method (FDM) solution of the Pennes bioheat equation. Simulations were performed for incident power density 50 W/[Formula: see text] and fat thicknesses from 0.005 m to 0.03 m, over incidence angles 0 °C- 80 °C. Throughout the manuscript, reflection is reported strictly as a power quantity [Formula: see text] rather than a field-amplitude coefficient. The thermal pipeline solves the steady-state Pennes equation in its direct [Formula: see text] form with consistent surface (Robin) and deep (Dirichlet) boundary conditions, and simulations are audited by an energy-conservation budget. Results indicate that while temperature increases remain below 0.4 °C at lower frequencies (433-915 MHz), significant superficial heating (up to 3.5 °C) occurs at 5.8 GHz due to reduced penetration depth, even at moderate exposure levels. The results demonstrate that subcutaneous fat acts as a low-loss impedance transformer whose thickness strongly modulates the balance between reflection and internal absorption, while polarization and angle primarily tune the detailed shape of angular reflection curves (including TM Brewster-like minima) at a given incident power. The analytical framework therefore complements voxel-based full-wave numerical models by providing fast, physically transparent trends across ISM bands that are directly relevant for preliminary assessment of wearable devices, implanted sensors, and compliance with radiofrequency safety limits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.